• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

HearingResearch.org

Latest hearing research

Home » Hearing Disorders » Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss

Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss

June 23, 2022 by Mark Ross

Auditory training can be defined as formal listening activities whose goal is to optimize the activity of speech perception (Dr. Arthur Boothroyd).   It is based on an assumption that listeners often need help in dealing with the speech perception deficits that remain after auditory function has been optimized through an appropriate hearing aid selection process.  This point cannot be overemphasized: engaging in auditory training without first being assured that the hearing aids are doing exactly what they should be doing is a waste of time for both the clinician and the consumer.

Note that the definition above includes the words “formal listening activities.” This serves to distinguish auditory training from the auditory learning that takes place whenever hearing aid users, particularly new users, are simply listening to speech. The amplified signals often sound a bit different to them, a bit strange. Hearing aid dispensers, from time immemorial, have always counseled new hearing aid users that it may take some time for them to “get used” to the new sounds the hearing aids are providing to their ears and their brains. It is an observation well grounded in years of experience.

In fact, a great deal of informal “auditory training” does take place during this initial hearing aid (and cochlear implant) adjustment phase. Hearing-impaired people are constantly trying to make sense of speech signals that are distorted in some fashion. Listening to speech is always a bit of a guessing game for them, in which they use their knowledge of the language and the context to fill in the acoustic gaps and distortions of the incoming speech signals. People do get better at this, over time. A formal listening program of auditory training assumes that hearing aid users have completed this initial adjustment stage, i.e., that they have reached a plateau in their listening skills and are now ready to attempt to further improve their performance through explicit training.

While auditory training has always theoretically been included within the scope of practice of Communication Disorders professionals, it was rarely used clinically – for several reasons. One was that, unlike speechreading (the other procedure which basically defined aural rehabilitation years ago), auditory training does not lend itself to group lessons; it must be practiced on a one-to-one basis. The other reason was that convincing research evidence attesting to its value was relatively sparse and did not appear to justify the time and expense that the activity required. But this view of auditory training has been changing in the last decade or so, thanks to developments in three areas.

The advent of the cochlear implant (CI) several decades ago was the first of these developments. The auditory sensations that the first generation of CI users received was so different from what they had been used to that they needed help in adjusting to, and learning to comprehend, these new and strange sound sensations. This is akin to orthopedic patients who routinely receive physical therapy after some sort of surgery (hip, knee, shoulder, etc.). In other words, if physical therapy helped people with post-surgical physical issues, why wouldn’t auditory therapy (training) be similarly helpful for people with hearing problems? And why limit therapy only to CI users, why not people wearing hearing aids as well? While the practice of auditory training had been with us for years, it seems not entirely coincidental that, since the advent of the CI, auditory training has been seeing a revival for both hearing aid and CI implant users.

The second of these developments was the emerging appreciation that mature neural systems – once viewed as immutable – are now beginning to be seen as malleable and subject to modification. Neuroscientists, using such procedures as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have quantified neural plasticity in adult human subjects. It appears that structural and physiological changes in the central nervous system can take place as a consequence of therapeutic intervention, such as repeated exposure to meaningful auditory stimuli in a training situation. Furthermore, there is evidence that these changes can be measured in the way the cortex responds to sound. In short, it seems that old dogs can learn new tricks.

The third development that has encouraged a new look at auditory training is the widespread use and familiarity with the personal computer and the Internet. Before this, it simply was not economically practical for clinicians to offer this service. To be effective, therapy has to be conducted frequently and over a relatively long period of time; any agency, including non-profit ones, concerned with the bottom line simply couldn’t afford to offer it as a routine clinical procedure. With personal computers and/or online training, however, it is now possible for people to conduct frequent training sessions at home, at a great savings in cost and personal convenience. The most effective model, in my opinion, is a blend of clinical and home activity, where the professionals can interact with the clients to monitor and provide assistance when needed.

Traditionally, auditory training can be separated into the analytic and synthetic approaches.  In the analytic technique, the focus is on the elements of speech, to improve a person’s ability to identify the various sounds of speech, specifically those with which the person has difficulty. Thus in training vowel identification, a person may be required to distinguish between such words as /beet/ and /boot/, which have two vowels that considerably differ acoustically. From there, a person may be challenged to distinguish finer and finer vowel differences. In analytic consonant training, the vowel remains the same, but now the target consonant is changed. This training also proceeds from large to finer acoustic distinctions. Analytic training is termed a “bottoms up” approach because the intent is to improve overall speech comprehension by focusing on the acoustic “building blocks” of speech messages. The reasoning is that if someone can reliably distinguish the acoustic elements of speech, then he or she should be better able to comprehend the larger units, such as sentences and paragraphs.

A synthetic training approach, on the other hand, employs meaningful sentences as training stimuli. Most often the sentences are presented to the listeners in the presence of noise, thus mimicking the situation in which most people with hearing loss have the greatest difficulty. The task of the listener is to focus on comprehending the sentence meaning without attending to specific acoustic elements. Modern techniques use a   presentation method in which the noise level is either increased or decreased automatically, depending upon whether or not the sentence was correctly understood. The intent is to ensure that listeners are continually challenged during the training session. The goal is for a listener to be able to comprehend speech in increasing levels of noise. As opposed to the “bottoms up” approach of the analytic technique, synthetic training is termed “top down,” as it requires listeners to employ their knowledge of language and context to fill in the acoustic/perceptual gaps in the message. In my judgment, both techniques have a place and both should be employed.

But now the central question of this article: Can auditory training assist hearing aid and cochlear implant users to improve their listening skills beyond that seen when people “get used to” the devices they are wearing? The short answer is “Yes,” provided the program is appropriate and sufficiently intensive. A few years ago, Sweetow and Palmer reviewed all the studies they could find that might even remotely be related to auditory training. They found 213 of them, but only six met the inclusion criteria that they employed (i.e., whether the study was “on topic” and met various research requirements).   The results of these six studies, dating from 1970 through 1996, suggested that auditory training can improve speech recognition skills to some extent, especially if it used a synthetic training approach. The best results were obtained with the more intensive programs (longer duration and more sessions per week).

Recent research on auditory training has focused on home-based training programs, with results that are less ambiguous than the early studies.   Currently, the most popular such program is termed LACE (for “Listening and Communication Enhancement”). This program can be completed at home, with or without the online guidance of a professional. In addition to the usual task incorporated in an auditory training program (recognizing speech in noise), LACE includes other relevant listening dimensions, such as comprehending rapid speech, and improving working auditory memory and processing speed. In a study published a few years ago, Sweetow and Henderson-Sabes found that their subjects made significant improvements in all the listening and cognitive dimensions for which they received specific training. It is reasonable to assume that these gains would positively impact on a person’s ability to communicate in the real-world. Furthermore, the study demonstrated significant improvement with listening tests for which the subjects had not been directly trained, demonstrating generalization beyond the training material. But it does take a sincere commitment by the user: five days a week, for at least thirty minutes per session, for a minimum of a month (see neurtone.com).

A new entry into the home-based auditory training market is termed “ReadMyQuips.” This is an audio-visual training program in which the subject both sees and hears the quips (sentences) being spoken. (Disclosure: I consulted on this program during some stages of its development.) It is an adaptive program in which the audio signal is alternately raised or lowered depending upon whether or not the answer was correct.  The response format is that of a crossword puzzle, with each box containing a word not a letter. The entire quip (taken from such luminaries as Groucho Marx and Winston Churchill) is spoken and the listener fills in all the boxes that he or she can. The format is meant to be entertaining and to engage a subject’s interest for a long period of time. Two studies were carried out with this program; both showed that the majority of subjects significantly improved their performance. Further, the analysis showed that improvements were directly related to the duration of time that a subject worked on it (see sensesynergy.com).

While cochlear implants have been extensively studied, relatively little formal research has been carried out specifically on the effectiveness of auditory training. At the House Ear Institute, Dr. Qian-Je Fu and his colleagues have conducted much of the available research and have employed both analytic and synthetic approaches. For analytic training and testing, they developed a program termed CAST, or Computer Assisted Speech Training. A version of this (called Sound and Way Beyond) is now available commercially through the Cochlear Corp. Ten experienced cochlear implant (CI) users tried the program at home for about one hour a day, five days a week, for one month or more.  The average results demonstrated significant improvements in the subjects’ vowel and consonant scores after training.  Other studies, conducted at the House Institute and elsewhere, required identifying sentences under noisy conditions. The results of these studies also showed significant improvements in sentence recognition after training. Overall, it seems that both bottoms up and top down training can produce gains in the speech perception skills of CI users.  For the interested person, listening activities can be found on all three cochlear implant websites (advancedbionics.com, med-el.com, cochlear.com). Practiced sufficiently assiduously, I have no doubt that individuals can improve their performance using these resources.

A number of authors have cautioned us that in order to be effective, a formal auditory training program must meet certain criteria:

  • One, very pertinent for this day and age, is that it must be cost effective.
  • It must be sufficiently engaging to sustain participation, not too easy and not too difficult.
  • It must be practical and easily accessible (home-based is best).
  • It should provide immediate feedback regarding responses.
  • Optimally, it should incorporate elements of both bottoms up and top down processing.
  • Optimally, too, it should include the active collaboration of a knowledgeable professional.

From my perspective, it does appear that auditory training is being resurrected from the dormant state it has been in since after WW II. Current developments, particularly in computers and the Internet, permit activities we could only dream about years ago. While professionals have a responsibility of making this option (home-based programs) known to their clients, it is still their clients – the person with a hearing loss – who often has to take the initiative. When it comes to hearing better, passivity is not an option.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Trending Posts

  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • The Connections Between Hearing Loss and Dementia
  • 5 Latest Treatments for Hearing Loss and Are They Effective?
  • 5 Signs and Symptoms of Hearing Loss
  • 5 Types of Hearing Aids and How To Choose the One for You
  • Age-Related Hearing Loss (Presbycusis): Six Treatment Options
  • Auditory Processing Disorder: When To Try Hearing Aids
  • Bilateral Hearing Loss: Types, Causes, and Treatments
  • Can a Deaf Person Hear With a Hearing Aid?
  • Can Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Cause Hearing Problems?
  • Deaf or Hard of Hearing: What’s the Difference?
  • Hearing Aids for Severe Hearing Loss: What To Know
  • Hearing Aids vs. Hearing Amplifiers: What‚Äôs the Difference?
  • Hearing Loss in One Ear: Causes & Treatment Options
  • High-Frequency Hearing Loss: Causes and Treatment Options
  • How Hearing Loss Can Affect Your Balance
  • Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: What Are Your Treatment Options?
  • Seven Common Causes of Hearing Loss¬†
  • The Connections Between Mental Health & Loss of Hearing
  • Treating and Recovering From Sudden Hearing Loss: What to Know
  • What Are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Children?
  • What are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Seniors?
  • What Does Unilateral Hearing Loss Mean?
  • What Is Hidden Hearing Loss and What You Can Do About It
  • What Is Mixed Hearing Loss?
  • What Percentage of Hearing Loss Is Legally Deaf?
  • Why Am I Hearing a Crackling Noise in My Ear?
  • Can Hearing Aids Help Tinnitus?
  • Conductive Hearing Loss: Types, Causes, and Treatments
  • Does Medicare Cover Hearing Aids? What To Know
  • Hearing Aids for Veterans: Three Things To Make Sure of
  • How Do I Know If I’m Losing My Hearing?
  • Seven Different Hearing Loss Tests, and What They Do
  • The Best Hearing Aids for Those Dealing With Sound Loss
  • What Level of Hearing Loss Requires a Hearing Aid?
  • What To Know Before Buying Hearing Aids
  • When Do You Need a Hearing Aid? Five Signs It May Be Time
  • What Are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Young Adults?
  • 7 Common Signs of a Child With Hearing Loss
  • Are Hearing Aids Useful for Mild Hearing Loss?¬†
  • Can You Buy Hearing Aids Over-the-Counter?
  • Difference Between Sensorineural & Conductive Hearing Loss
  • Does Insurance Cover Hearing Aids?
  • Hearing Loss From Meningitis: Everything You Need To Know
  • The 4 Types of Hearing Impairment & What They Mean
  • What Is Acoustic Trauma & How Do You Know You Have It?
  • What Is Asymmetrical Hearing Loss?
  • TELECOIL AND TELEPHONES
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • LARGE AREA ASSISTIVE LISTENING SYSTEMS (ALS): REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Feedback Cancellation Systems and Open-Ear Hearing Aid Fitting
  • Some Reflections on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Hearing Aids
  • Helpful Hints to the New Hearing Aid User
  • Environmentally Adaptive Hearing Aids
  • MULTICHANNEL AND MULTI-MICROPHONE DIRECTIONAL HEARING AIDS: Fitting Procedures and Evaluation of Current and Emergent Technology
  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANL)
  • Dr. Mark Ross is a Principal Investigator of the RERC on Hearing Enhancement,
  • Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss Noise Reduction Hearing Aids: Why They’re Needed, and How They Work
  • Evaluating the Performance of a Hearing Aid in the Real-Ear
  • Audiogram
  • Hearing Aid Companies
  • CURRICULUM VITAE: LINDA KOZMA-SPYTEK
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • Developments in Tinnitus
  • TELECOIL AND TELEPHONES
  • Personal and Social Identity of Hard of Hearing People
  • Over-the-Counter (OTC) Hearing Aids
  • Dr. Mark Ross is a Principal Investigator of the RERC on Hearing Enhancement
  • A Retrospective Look at the Future of Aural Rehabilitation
  • Home-based Auditory and Speechreading Training
  • Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Digital Hearing Aids: From the Perspective of One Consumer/Audiologist
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • Listening to Music Through a Cochlear Implant: Part 1
  • Audibility and Useful Hearing Aid Features
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • Different kinds of implants: Auditory, Penetrating and Hybrid
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • Are Binaural Hearing Aids Better?
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Acoustic Feedback Control
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Frequency-Lowering Hearing Aids: Increasing the Audibility of High-Frequency Speech Sounds
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANL)
  • Hearing Aid Troubleshooting
  • The “Stigma” of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids
  • Mark Ross
  • STI PROGRAM INFORMATION
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Low Frequency Residual Hearing Revisited
  • When a Hearing Aid is NOT Enough: Consider other types of Hearing Assistance Technologies

Footer

About Us

Our goal is to address the growing issue of hearing health by conducting innovative research and providing education on how to prevent, detect, preserve, and treat hearing and balance disorders.

Recent Posts

  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • The Connections Between Hearing Loss and Dementia
  • 5 Latest Treatments for Hearing Loss and Are They Effective?
  • 5 Signs and Symptoms of Hearing Loss
  • 5 Types of Hearing Aids and How To Choose the One for You

Copyright © 2023 · Expert Advice from Audiologists · Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy · Editorial Policy · Partnership with Diabetic.org