• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

HearingResearch.org

Latest hearing research

Home » Hearing Disorders » Classroom Sound-Field Systems

Classroom Sound-Field Systems

June 23, 2022 by Mark Ross

Much has been written about classroom sound-field amplification systems since they were first introduced about twenty years ago. As their potential contribution to children in classrooms becomes increasingly clear, there now appears to be a developing professional consensus regarding their efficacy. Indeed, those professionals who use and/or evaluate classroom sound-field system view them as one of the most significant technical developments that have taken place in schools in recent years. In actuality, however, they do not represent a technical breakthrough as much as a special application of a commonly used device.

Classroom sound-field systems are basically Public Address (PA) systems with the inclusion of a wireless microphone. As the teacher talks into the microphone his/her voice is transmitted to a specialized receiver/amplifier that is connected to, or physically a component of, a loudspeaker assembly. The loudspeakers may be located in the ceiling, on the walls around the room, or at the room corners. Whatever arrangement is used, the purpose of the system is to ensure that the teacher’s voice is clearly audible above the background sounds at all instructional locations within the room. Research has shown that in the average classroom, the teacher’s voice usually arrives at the children at a level only 6 dB or so above the background sounds. The extra 8 or 10dB of amplification provided by a classroom sound field system is sufficient to ensure a more suitable speech to noise ratio.

The rationale underlying these systems is very simple: how well children hear a teacher affects how well they learn. The more they can hear, and the less they have to strain and guess, the better chance they will have of learning their lessons. The hearing “boost” offered by these systems seems to be most advantageous for children with mild hearing losses, but has also been shown to help children with special auditory needs (e.g. children with central auditory processing problems, attention deficit and learning disorders, and second language learners). Basically, what they do is take some of the auditory strain out of the auditory learning process.

The initial generation of sound-field systems employed an FM radio signal for the wireless microphones. This is still widely utilized and, for some types of situations, this is the system of choice. In the past few years, Infra-Red (IR) classroom amplification systems have been introduced. Their advantage lies in the fact that they preclude interference between classrooms or from outside radio sources. This is because, unlike FM systems, the IR signal is contained within the classroom. Some systems come with an additional “pass around” microphone designed to be used by the children as they recite, ask or answer questions, etc. Teachers report that one of the bonuses of this arrangement is a much more orderly class. The children have to wait to talk until they have the microphone (something that teacher’s love!).

Classroom sound-field systems are not intended for children with moderate hearing losses or greater, for whom a personal FM system would ordinarily be more appropriate. These children would still benefit more from a personal FM system than from a classroom system. The use of a classroom system also does not eliminate the need for appropriate acoustical treatment in classrooms. These systems do not work too well in noisy and reverberant environments.

Since the first research project on these systems some 20 years ago, there have been more than 50 additional studies testifying to their efficacy. The “special” children in the amplified classrooms attain higher speech perception and spelling scores, attend to the teacher for longer periods of time, and score higher on academic achievement tests than children in non-amplified classrooms. Evidence is continuing to accumulate regarding their positive impact upon literacy, academic accomplishments, and classroom behavior. There is less “acting out” or “tuning out” problems. Classroom systems have been shown to be a cost-effective way of minimizing special education referrals and services. In one large school district, such referrals dropped to about half compared to what they were before the systems were introduced in most elementary classrooms.

While classroom sound-field systems were initially designed for the “special needs” children, experience has demonstrated that the normally hearing children in the classroom are also benefiting. Presumably, while these children have no difficulty understanding the teacher in an unamplified classroom, they are nevertheless able to do this with much less effort and more certainty in an amplified classroom. Clearly, even normally hearing children have to hear well in order to learn well!

As an additional bonus, the teachers’ responses to the systems are almost uniformly positive. They appreciate being able to teach all day without straining their voices. This is not a trivial advantage. In one large scale study, it was found that 20% of the teachers suffered from some sort of active voice pathology, with 70% reporting voice problems in the past that caused them to miss work and/or that impaired their teaching effectiveness. In two laryngological practices, teachers were the most frequent occupation identified, representing proportions of 20% and 16% of the total caseload. So while classroom systems were designed to help “special needs” children, and there is much evidence to support this goal, it is apparent that the benefits to teachers should not be overlooked.

The potential market for classroom sound-field systems is enormous and more and more companies are introducing new systems, or modifying their older ones. In the most recent Educational Audiology Conference, leading manufacturers report that they are not only exploring current issues related to installation and application, but are also looking at such future interesting developments as “bending wave panels and reflect technologies” that may significantly reduce speaker wiring and simplify installation. One company is now marketing a single speaker system that they claim can present an equal sound field through an average classroom. Refinements of existing systems are a frequent occurrence.

One recent development in classroom amplification systems has targeted the human element as well as the variability of background noises in the classrooms. That is, teachers do not talk at exactly the same loudness level all during the day, and there may be periods when, on a temporary basis, additional unwanted noise enters the classroom. In the usual system, when this happens, there is no change in the degree of amplification provided by the system. The signal from the teacher simply drops (if he/she talks softer) or gets buried somewhat in the noise (if background sounds significantly increase). The application of an “ambient noise compensation” (ANC) system in classrooms, previously used only in the professional sound-reinforcement industry, is designed to rectify this situation.

The ANC system, developed by Oval Window Inc., employs digital signal processing to make appropriate decisions about the signal-to-noise status of the sound-field system. It can be used with any type of classroom sound-field system, FM or Infra-Red. A “sense-microphone” is located some six feet away from one of the sound-field system’s loudspeakers. The function of this “sense microphone” is to monitor and compare the loudspeaker’s acoustic output with the electrical input signal from the teacher’s microphone. Using this information, the ANC automatically adjusts the gain of the sound-field system up to 12 dB to compensate for loudness changes in the teacher’s speech or the ambient noise levels. Basically, what it is doing is ensure a constant signal-to-noise ratio at the children’s desks. The potential contribution of the ANC system was demonstrated in several listening studies that compared it to a sound-field system lacking an ANC. Overall, somewhat better performance on speech recognition tests were obtained with the ANC system than with conventional sound-field systems.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Trending Posts

  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • The Connections Between Hearing Loss and Dementia
  • 5 Latest Treatments for Hearing Loss and Are They Effective?
  • 5 Signs and Symptoms of Hearing Loss
  • 5 Types of Hearing Aids and How To Choose the One for You
  • Age-Related Hearing Loss (Presbycusis): Six Treatment Options
  • Auditory Processing Disorder: When To Try Hearing Aids
  • Bilateral Hearing Loss: Types, Causes, and Treatments
  • Can a Deaf Person Hear With a Hearing Aid?
  • Can Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Cause Hearing Problems?
  • Deaf or Hard of Hearing: What’s the Difference?
  • Hearing Aids for Severe Hearing Loss: What To Know
  • Hearing Aids vs. Hearing Amplifiers: What‚Äôs the Difference?
  • Hearing Loss in One Ear: Causes & Treatment Options
  • High-Frequency Hearing Loss: Causes and Treatment Options
  • How Hearing Loss Can Affect Your Balance
  • Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: What Are Your Treatment Options?
  • Seven Common Causes of Hearing Loss¬†
  • The Connections Between Mental Health & Loss of Hearing
  • Treating and Recovering From Sudden Hearing Loss: What to Know
  • What Are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Children?
  • What are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Seniors?
  • What Does Unilateral Hearing Loss Mean?
  • What Is Hidden Hearing Loss and What You Can Do About It
  • What Is Mixed Hearing Loss?
  • What Percentage of Hearing Loss Is Legally Deaf?
  • Why Am I Hearing a Crackling Noise in My Ear?
  • Can Hearing Aids Help Tinnitus?
  • Conductive Hearing Loss: Types, Causes, and Treatments
  • Does Medicare Cover Hearing Aids? What To Know
  • Hearing Aids for Veterans: Three Things To Make Sure of
  • How Do I Know If I’m Losing My Hearing?
  • Seven Different Hearing Loss Tests, and What They Do
  • The Best Hearing Aids for Those Dealing With Sound Loss
  • What Level of Hearing Loss Requires a Hearing Aid?
  • What To Know Before Buying Hearing Aids
  • When Do You Need a Hearing Aid? Five Signs It May Be Time
  • What Are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Young Adults?
  • 7 Common Signs of a Child With Hearing Loss
  • Are Hearing Aids Useful for Mild Hearing Loss?¬†
  • Can You Buy Hearing Aids Over-the-Counter?
  • Difference Between Sensorineural & Conductive Hearing Loss
  • Does Insurance Cover Hearing Aids?
  • Hearing Loss From Meningitis: Everything You Need To Know
  • The 4 Types of Hearing Impairment & What They Mean
  • What Is Acoustic Trauma & How Do You Know You Have It?
  • What Is Asymmetrical Hearing Loss?
  • TELECOIL AND TELEPHONES
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • LARGE AREA ASSISTIVE LISTENING SYSTEMS (ALS): REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Feedback Cancellation Systems and Open-Ear Hearing Aid Fitting
  • Some Reflections on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Hearing Aids
  • Helpful Hints to the New Hearing Aid User
  • Environmentally Adaptive Hearing Aids
  • MULTICHANNEL AND MULTI-MICROPHONE DIRECTIONAL HEARING AIDS: Fitting Procedures and Evaluation of Current and Emergent Technology
  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANL)
  • Dr. Mark Ross is a Principal Investigator of the RERC on Hearing Enhancement,
  • Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss Noise Reduction Hearing Aids: Why They’re Needed, and How They Work
  • Evaluating the Performance of a Hearing Aid in the Real-Ear
  • Audiogram
  • Hearing Aid Companies
  • CURRICULUM VITAE: LINDA KOZMA-SPYTEK
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • Developments in Tinnitus
  • TELECOIL AND TELEPHONES
  • Personal and Social Identity of Hard of Hearing People
  • Over-the-Counter (OTC) Hearing Aids
  • Dr. Mark Ross is a Principal Investigator of the RERC on Hearing Enhancement
  • A Retrospective Look at the Future of Aural Rehabilitation
  • Home-based Auditory and Speechreading Training
  • Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Digital Hearing Aids: From the Perspective of One Consumer/Audiologist
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • Listening to Music Through a Cochlear Implant: Part 1
  • Audibility and Useful Hearing Aid Features
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • Different kinds of implants: Auditory, Penetrating and Hybrid
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • Are Binaural Hearing Aids Better?
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Acoustic Feedback Control
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Frequency-Lowering Hearing Aids: Increasing the Audibility of High-Frequency Speech Sounds
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANL)
  • Hearing Aid Troubleshooting
  • The “Stigma” of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids
  • Mark Ross
  • STI PROGRAM INFORMATION
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Low Frequency Residual Hearing Revisited
  • When a Hearing Aid is NOT Enough: Consider other types of Hearing Assistance Technologies

Footer

About Us

Our goal is to address the growing issue of hearing health by conducting innovative research and providing education on how to prevent, detect, preserve, and treat hearing and balance disorders.

Recent Posts

  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • The Connections Between Hearing Loss and Dementia
  • 5 Latest Treatments for Hearing Loss and Are They Effective?
  • 5 Signs and Symptoms of Hearing Loss
  • 5 Types of Hearing Aids and How To Choose the One for You

Copyright © 2023 · Expert Advice from Audiologists · Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy · Editorial Policy · Partnership with Diabetic.org