• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

HearingResearch.org

Latest hearing research

Home » Hearing Disorders » Environmentally Adaptive Hearing Aids

Environmentally Adaptive Hearing Aids

June 23, 2022 by Mark Ross

The only sound dimension that was “adaptive”  with my first hearing aid was the loudness. I could choose to turn the volume control up or down, and that was it.  True, the aid also contained an accessible tone control with three choices (normal, high-tone, and low-tone), but for the most part, I (and most hearing aid users) left that one alone. Evidently, I was one of those volume control “fiddlers” that the hearing aid dispensers at the time inveighed against. “Don’t fiddle with the volume wheel,” they would counsel their clients. “Normal hearing people can’t keep adjusting the volume of the sound, and neither should you.” But they really didn’t know what they were talking about. For example, a 10 dB increase in sound input may double the loudness for a normal hearing person, while for a hearing-aid user this same 10 dB increase may cause an intolerably loud auditory sensation (because of the phenomenon known as “recruitment”).  Conversely, while for a normal hearing person, a 10 dB decrease in sound input may reduce the loudness sensation by about half, for a hearing aid user this same reduction may make the sound totally or virtually inaudible.

So to get the loudness sensation right, or as close to it as possible, most hearing aid users   at the time employed what I facetiously termed AFC, or automatic finger control (audiologists just love acronyms). We constantly fiddled with the volume control. For many of us, it became an almost instinctive action, one that scarcely occupied our attention. But there were also many people who, for a number of very legitimate reasons, found the necessity of constantly adjusting the volume control to be a difficult or inconvenient task. Years ago, the hearing aid industry responded to this by including an automatic gain control circuit (AGC) in their hearing aids. This was, I believe, the first automatic, or environmentally adaptive, feature to be included in hearing aids. And it is probably still the most important. The modern version of an AGC, present in just about all digital hearing aids, is called “Wide Dynamic Range Compression” or WDRC (another acronym, sorry about that).  Basically, what this feature does is adjust the degree of amplification of the entire range of loudness input levels, while at the same time ensuring that no input sound is amplified to the point where it is uncomfortably loud. In a way, this feature does the “fiddling” for the hearing aid user. Soft sounds are boosted in loudness, while loud inputs are toned down somewhat. The goal is to ensure comfortable sound sensations across the entire range of frequencies amplified by the hearing aid, regardless of the changing input sound levels.

The specific amounts of amplification used in hearing aids possessing this feature are set during the fitting process. The hearing aid user makes judgments as to the loudness of input sounds (too quiet, just right, too loud, etc.) in quiet and under various simulated environmental noise conditions, and this information is then programmed into the hearing aid. And there it remains until and unless the hearing aid is later reprogrammed. But does this initial programming get it right, all or most of the time? This was one of the questions asked in a recent study published in the Hearing Journal.

The investigator (Dr. Gitte Keidser) asked 28 experienced hearing aid users to keep a structured listening diary for two weeks. At specific intervals during the day, they would log the specific category of background sound they were then encountering (speech in quiet, speech in noise, music, mostly quiet, or mostly noisy). They then recorded their judgment of the overall loudness level of the sound, as either just right, louder or softer than preferred, or much louder or much softer than preferred. All the subjects were individually fitted with an “environmentally adaptive hearing aid.” The programming goal was to provide a comfortable loudness sensation in the various sound backgrounds. The question asked by the study was: How often did the aid get it right in each of the listening backgrounds? As I consider the results, the answer seems to vary from “not bad” to “not good enough.”

In listening to speech in quiet, only 55% of the participants rated the loudness as “just right,” with the others feeling the speech was either somewhat louder or softer than preferred. “Just right” judgments declined when listening to speech in noise, with only about one-third of the subjects feeling satisfied with the loudness; the remainder of the time, they felt that the sound was either softer or louder than preferred. In a noisy situation, with nobody talking, over half the subjects felt that the aid provided a loudness sensation louder than they would prefer.  The highest loudness comfort scores were obtained when listening to the radio or TV (58%). This makes sense if we consider that here the participants did have access to a volume control, but on the TV set and not on the hearing aid itself.

The study also noted a certain inconsistency in the ratings. Over the course of the study, the participants often found themselves in the same type of listening situation (e.g., speech in noise), either during the same day or on different days. However, they did not necessarily rate the loudness sensation the same each time they encountered a similar type of listening situation. And this should not surprise us. Recall, that during the hearing aid programming process, the loudness level was adjusted to provide a comfortable listening experience – but only for that day, with that specific speech stimulus and noise background. In short, the loudness programming was a snapshot of reality but not reality itself. For that, one has to get out of the clinic and into real life. In real life, little about a listening situation is static; the composition of the noise, the person talking, the hearing aid user’s interest in the message, and the physical surroundings are always changing. A one-time hearing aid programming decision cannot, therefore, completely replicate a person’s everyday listening experiences.

Not surprisingly, the study concludes that some individual manipulation of the volume control is desirable, even with an environmentally adaptive hearing aid. The findings indicate “that at least two-thirds of the participants would, at some point, want gain adjusted when in a given class of environment.” In other words, there is still a need for the tried-and-true volume control. Fortunately, it is possible to have it both ways. The hearing aid can be programmed to provide reasonable “ball-park” loudness in various situations, while an external volume control can be included for finer loudness tuning when desired (for example, manual control of plus or minus 5 dB around the automatic values).

The newest generation of digital hearing aids are simply loaded with environmentally adaptive features.  In addition to controlling loudness, they operate on many other dimensions of .a hearing aid’s performance.  In point of fact, it is the number of these features and the extent that listening decisions are automatically selected that define a “premium” hearing aid. The ultimate premium aid is one that is presumed to work optimally and automatically in every changing environment. (“Look Ma, no hands.”). At a minimum, these aids would include the following features: dynamic feedback suppression, adaptive directional microphones, Auto-T coils, multiple channels (up to 20),  multiple memories, and various noise reduction or speech enhancement programs. Since understanding speech in noise is the most frequent complaint voiced by hearing aid users, manufacturers have devoted most of their research and engineering efforts in premium hearing aids to address this issue.

The signal processing algorithms employed by many hearing aids are designed to classify incoming sounds as speech in quiet, speech in noise, noise alone, mechanical sounds, impulse sounds, wind noise, and music (not necessarily all in any one hearing aid). Each of these noise conditions requires a special signal processing strategy intended to maximize speech comprehension in a particular environment. At the premium level, the hearing aid is presumed to automatically shift into the appropriate speech processing strategy, as the nature of the noise background changes. At less than the premium level (e.g., entry, economy, low, mid, or mid-high level aids), a user may be required to manually select a desired program, if it is available (e.g., speech in noise, directionality, music, etc.). Whether the convenience of automatic shifting is worth the extra cost of a premium level hearing aid is a question that people must answer for themselves, it being understood that the necessary comparative information is being supplied by the hearing aid dispenser.

Speech enhancement programs are another interesting environmentally adaptive feature found in many current advanced hearing aids. Through the use of special detectors, this program analyzes the speech to noise ratio that exists in each channel of the hearing aid. When the speech to noise ratio is positive (speech louder than the noise), the degree of amplification (gain) is automatically increased in that particular channel. When the noise signal dominates, the gain in the channel is reduced (perhaps via another adaptive noise program). Hearing aid manufacturers make a persuasive theoretical case regarding the merits of such automatic features; however, it would be reassuring to hearing aid users if the theoretical merits could be validated by research conducted on human beings. Actually, this comment applies to just about all of the special features found in advanced hearing aids, not just speech enhancement or noise suppression programs.

Automatic telephone coils (Auto T coils) are another adaptive feature that can be found in many premium hearing aids.  All a user has to do is answer the phone normally, and the T coil in the hearing aid will automatically be switched on. After a stumbling start (the first Auto T coil did not work with induction loop systems), most hearing aid companies now apparently make provision for both the Auto T coil and for a way to manually access the T coil for other than telephone usage (as an assistive listening device receiver). However, while hearing instruments may include this capability, the aids do have to be appropriately programmed in order for the capability to be realized. Since most new hearing aid users probably never heard of a T coil, it is up to the dispensing professional to inform his or her clients what it is, how it should be used with both telephones and with induction loop systems, and what the clients have to do to access it on their hearing aids (e.g., toggling to the right memory).

This is where the human factor comes in; too often, from what I keep hearing, the T coil is often the forgotten element in the hearing aid selection and fitting process. It may not be as glamorous as the other features in an environmentally adaptive hearing aid, but it does directly impact upon the basic purpose of a hearing aid, and that is for the person to hear better in many types of situations. As one personal example, I use the T coil in my hearing aid and cochlear implant while talking on the telephone (a neckloop permits me to use both ears); at religious services, I plug a neckloop into the provided FM receiver; and, finally, I listen to the TV using a small floor loop connected to the TV. It is the T coil that makes all these functions possible and I can’t imagine being without it.
The importance I place on a T coil would be immediately apparent to any Audiologist who accessed the Data Logging feature on my hearing aid. This feature, found in about 40% of current hearing aids, records a great deal of information about a person’s hearing aid usage. By examining the data log, the hearing aid dispenser can determine the duration of hearing aid usage, the volume control setting, the types of listening environments a person is exposed to, the incidence and extent of volume control adjustments in the various environments, and the actual use of special features (e.g., automatic directional, noise reduction, feedback suppression). This information can be very helpful for Audiologists during counseling and the follow-up process. It can, for example, show that the programmed gain in different environments needs to be changed to reflect the reality of a person’s current hearing aid usage.

During a post-fitting visit, the Audiologist may look at the hearing aid use data. If the data shows only minimal use of a hearing aid, then the question is “Why?” If the log shows that the person is in quiet 90% of the time but has the directional microphones switched on most of the time then, again, the question is “Why?” Does the person understand how to use this feature? In one real-life example, a client complained that the VC did not work. Checking the data log, the Audiologist noted that the volume control was never changed. It turns out that the client was pressing on the battery compartment when trying to make volume control changes! Before we laugh at this user’s ineptness, we should reflect how often we’ve all done things like this ourselves.

Hearing aids have come a long way since the days that a user had to constantly “fiddle” with the volume control in order to get it right. And there’s no doubt that a great deal of creative engineering has made life easier for many hearing aid users in recent years. But I would add the following caveat: There is still a need, in my opinion, for the human factor. Audiologists still have to “listen” to their clients, judge their listening needs and capabilities, and make their recommendations accordingly. And that may include reducing or eliminating some of the “automatic” control for certain operations, such as partial volume control and manual selection of the T coil.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Trending Posts

  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • The Connections Between Hearing Loss and Dementia
  • 5 Latest Treatments for Hearing Loss and Are They Effective?
  • 5 Signs and Symptoms of Hearing Loss
  • 5 Types of Hearing Aids and How To Choose the One for You
  • Age-Related Hearing Loss (Presbycusis): Six Treatment Options
  • Auditory Processing Disorder: When To Try Hearing Aids
  • Bilateral Hearing Loss: Types, Causes, and Treatments
  • Can a Deaf Person Hear With a Hearing Aid?
  • Can Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Cause Hearing Problems?
  • Deaf or Hard of Hearing: What’s the Difference?
  • Hearing Aids for Severe Hearing Loss: What To Know
  • Hearing Aids vs. Hearing Amplifiers: What‚Äôs the Difference?
  • Hearing Loss in One Ear: Causes & Treatment Options
  • High-Frequency Hearing Loss: Causes and Treatment Options
  • How Hearing Loss Can Affect Your Balance
  • Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: What Are Your Treatment Options?
  • Seven Common Causes of Hearing Loss¬†
  • The Connections Between Mental Health & Loss of Hearing
  • Treating and Recovering From Sudden Hearing Loss: What to Know
  • What Are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Children?
  • What are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Seniors?
  • What Does Unilateral Hearing Loss Mean?
  • What Is Hidden Hearing Loss and What You Can Do About It
  • What Is Mixed Hearing Loss?
  • What Percentage of Hearing Loss Is Legally Deaf?
  • Why Am I Hearing a Crackling Noise in My Ear?
  • Can Hearing Aids Help Tinnitus?
  • Conductive Hearing Loss: Types, Causes, and Treatments
  • Does Medicare Cover Hearing Aids? What To Know
  • Hearing Aids for Veterans: Three Things To Make Sure of
  • How Do I Know If I’m Losing My Hearing?
  • Seven Different Hearing Loss Tests, and What They Do
  • The Best Hearing Aids for Those Dealing With Sound Loss
  • What Level of Hearing Loss Requires a Hearing Aid?
  • What To Know Before Buying Hearing Aids
  • When Do You Need a Hearing Aid? Five Signs It May Be Time
  • What Are the Best Hearing Aid Options for Young Adults?
  • 7 Common Signs of a Child With Hearing Loss
  • Are Hearing Aids Useful for Mild Hearing Loss?¬†
  • Can You Buy Hearing Aids Over-the-Counter?
  • Difference Between Sensorineural & Conductive Hearing Loss
  • Does Insurance Cover Hearing Aids?
  • Hearing Loss From Meningitis: Everything You Need To Know
  • The 4 Types of Hearing Impairment & What They Mean
  • What Is Acoustic Trauma & How Do You Know You Have It?
  • What Is Asymmetrical Hearing Loss?
  • TELECOIL AND TELEPHONES
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • LARGE AREA ASSISTIVE LISTENING SYSTEMS (ALS): REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Feedback Cancellation Systems and Open-Ear Hearing Aid Fitting
  • Some Reflections on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) Hearing Aids
  • Helpful Hints to the New Hearing Aid User
  • Environmentally Adaptive Hearing Aids
  • MULTICHANNEL AND MULTI-MICROPHONE DIRECTIONAL HEARING AIDS: Fitting Procedures and Evaluation of Current and Emergent Technology
  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANL)
  • Dr. Mark Ross is a Principal Investigator of the RERC on Hearing Enhancement,
  • Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss Noise Reduction Hearing Aids: Why They’re Needed, and How They Work
  • Evaluating the Performance of a Hearing Aid in the Real-Ear
  • Audiogram
  • Hearing Aid Companies
  • CURRICULUM VITAE: LINDA KOZMA-SPYTEK
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • Developments in Tinnitus
  • TELECOIL AND TELEPHONES
  • Personal and Social Identity of Hard of Hearing People
  • Over-the-Counter (OTC) Hearing Aids
  • Dr. Mark Ross is a Principal Investigator of the RERC on Hearing Enhancement
  • A Retrospective Look at the Future of Aural Rehabilitation
  • Home-based Auditory and Speechreading Training
  • Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Digital Hearing Aids: From the Perspective of One Consumer/Audiologist
  • Why do Hearing Aids Cost So Much?
  • Listening to Music Through a Cochlear Implant: Part 1
  • Audibility and Useful Hearing Aid Features
  • My “Near Deaf” Experience
  • Different kinds of implants: Auditory, Penetrating and Hybrid
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • Are Binaural Hearing Aids Better?
  • Classroom Sound-Field Systems
  • Acoustic Feedback Control
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Frequency-Lowering Hearing Aids: Increasing the Audibility of High-Frequency Speech Sounds
  • Hearing Aid Services and Satisfaction: The Consumer Viewpoint
  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANL)
  • Hearing Aid Troubleshooting
  • The “Stigma” of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids
  • Mark Ross
  • STI PROGRAM INFORMATION
  • The Audiogram: Explanation and Significance
  • Low Frequency Residual Hearing Revisited
  • When a Hearing Aid is NOT Enough: Consider other types of Hearing Assistance Technologies

Footer

About Us

Our goal is to address the growing issue of hearing health by conducting innovative research and providing education on how to prevent, detect, preserve, and treat hearing and balance disorders.

Recent Posts

  • The “Occlusion Effect” — What it is, and What to Do About it
  • The Connections Between Hearing Loss and Dementia
  • 5 Latest Treatments for Hearing Loss and Are They Effective?
  • 5 Signs and Symptoms of Hearing Loss
  • 5 Types of Hearing Aids and How To Choose the One for You

Copyright © 2023 · Expert Advice from Audiologists · Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy · Editorial Policy · Partnership with Diabetic.org